What is a common Law Pure Trust?

What is a common Law Pure Trust?

Introduction and Provisions Summary

By: Sri Dr. Lord Grantham Taylor, Hughes J.d., L.c.m.d., Ph.d.

The importance of this trust remains that governments were originally created by the former, but after many generations descendants forgot this fact. When remembering, as we have done today, and seeing that the government creations always “get out-of-hand,” one needs to protect themselves from their own creation. Hence, the richest families (Polity) i.e., von Bauer-Rothschild, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Brown-Harriman, von Warburg (twelve in all) et al created their provisions and refined them. The provisions are a part of the present trust herein. A common Law Pure Trust (cLPT) protects one’s land and assets from any government intervention. By positioning one’s land and assets properly, they manage and control them, but never own them. This language is very critical for proper control. Simply, if one owns land and assets, they owe taxes, duties, and allegiance to the managers or controllers. If one positions themselves as the latter, they are then the controllers and managers. It is that simple and the sole way of re-positioning oneself is through a cLPT. If one has any questions, please contact your trust representative. The present environment has the governments, businesses, and non-enacted sovereigns having no authority to act under the international bankruptcy. Therefore, the plaintiff is not revealing that they act for one of the Polity and violate Uniform Commercial code (UCc) 1-308 in the process. Full disclosure remains the precedent and if none exists it is challengeable under the UCc bankruptcy laws of §1-308, “A party with explicit reservation of privileges, performs, promises, and/or assents unto performance offered and/or demanded by the other party does not prejudice the privileges reserved.” (very important to memorise the previous quote). In other words, the defendant is putting the plaintiff on notice that the former is aware of the law and counterclaiming or crossclaiming (countersuing or crosssuing) and/or making a redress of grievance under two counts of violating the UCc regarding that the plaintiff has no authority unto operate or act and not revealing that to the original plaintiff. In other words, the world has been under bankruptcy since the 1930 Geneva Convention.

The common Law Pure Trust originated just after the middle ages in the 12th century with King Henry II Plantagenet. The Catholic Church, before this time, had control of most land and assets. Once Henry finagled some away, he established the cLPT with his new partner Lord Bauer, the progenitor of the present day Bauer-Rothschild family, the richest of the twelve polity or rich bank trading families. The cLPT provisions, the written rules of the trust, have had one hundred and four (104) revisions. The last three have been revised by a former Bauer-Rothschild attorney, Baron von Brauchitsch Bauer-Rothschild who is a cousin and author of this introduction. The Rev. CIV is the one within this package.

Henry and Lord Bauer made the first fidelity ceremony explained in Art. I of Rev. CIV provisions in circa 12th century providing the cLPT creation and execution. The Rothschild cLPT has been intact since that time. Other cLPTs that use the provisions, but are independent of the original, have been liquidated incorrectly when Successor Lord managing Directors have inadvertently or ignorantly failed to succeed the cLPT correctly. That is the bane of succession wherein the original Lord managing Director (LmD) cannot control what his successor may do after his death or resignation. That would ironically be the sole flaw of the cLPT, but that cannot be helped as of time and space considerations. Of course, the original LmD is gone and really has no concern at this point as of death. It is the fallacy of insurance companies believing that the insured will care more than a tinker’s damn after he or she has expired.

Moreover, the fidelity ceremony has created a misnomer that the cLPT is tied to marriage between a man and woman somehow? The misconstruances remains that the cLPT is about contract marriage not a marriage contract. A contract marriage means that two people come together in tryst (original definition had no romantic connotations) or meeting and exchange an agreement vows in the form of a trust (derived from the word “tryst”) certificate. This certificate simply verified or proved the fidelity ceremony occurred. Hence, once this extremely important tryst took place, the trust was executed after the two parties signed the trust certificate and the acknowledgements of Part III. Originally, only the trust certificate was signed, but later the polity deemed more explanation and signing was necessary for execution, carrying-out, initiating, effecting, starting, etc., the trust.

Thus, this introduction will also give a cursory instruction in execution of the trust. The “cursory” factor means that when one receives their trust, they only need to sign certain documents to execute it. Some other signatures will already have been done, so the managing Director (mD) need not be concerned with so many details. It is true, that one should know as much as possible about their trust, but the mD should appreciate that the present revisionist-author has taken many years to become proficient in this work. The mD signs only his contract in part V of “Addenda Contracts” and the cLPT is executed. It is true that he or she should designate their Successor in the form minutes in the back of part VI. However, technically that act has nothing to do with trust execution.

Leave a Comment

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons